 |
| Representtative Image |
In a landmark ruling that empowers homebuyers across India, the Supreme Court has affirmed that protesting peacefully against builders is a constitutional right and does not amount to defamation. This decision sets a powerful precedent for consumer rights in the real estate sector.
What the Supreme Court Said
The judgment came from a bench comprising Justices K V Viswanathan and N Kotiswar Singh. The Court clearly stated that a peaceful protest is a legitimate tool for consumers to express dissatisfaction, much like how sellers exercise their commercial speech through advertising.
“A right to protest peacefully without falling foul of the law is a corresponding right, which the consumers ought to possess just as the seller enjoys his right to commercial speech,” said the Court.
Why the Case Matters
This ruling arose from a criminal defamation case filed by a builder against a group of homebuyers who had erected banners expressing grievances. The builder claimed the banners were defamatory. However, the Supreme Court disagreed, noting that the protest was peaceful, devoid of offensive language, and focused on real issues like “ignored grievances.”
Peaceful Protest is Not Defamation
The Supreme Court emphasized that no abusive or foul language was used in the banners. The content merely highlighted concerns like delay in possession, poor service, or lack of communication. Such issues, the Court said, are normal in a buyer-seller relationship and must be allowed to be expressed, as long as they are raised respectfully.
“The appellants did not cross the lakshman rekha. Their protest was peaceful, and the language used was mild and temperate,” the bench noted.
Consumers Have Constitutional Protection
The judgment highlights that peaceful protest is safeguarded under Article 19(1)(a), (b), and (c) of the Indian Constitution, which protects freedom of speech, peaceful assembly, and the right to form associations.
The Court observed that as long as consumers protest in good faith, without malicious intent or baseless allegations like fraud or cheating, they are protected by law. This also falls under Exception 9 to Section 499 of the Indian Penal Code, which deals with defamation.
Abuse of Legal Process Should Be Curbed
The apex court went a step further, calling out builders who misuse defamation laws to silence genuine grievances.
“Any attempt to portray a peaceful protest as a criminal offence, sans necessary ingredients, is a clear abuse of legal process and must be nipped in the bud,” said the Court.
What This Means for Homebuyers
This decision is a major win for property buyers, especially in ongoing and delayed housing projects. It gives residents and apartment owners' associations a green light to organize banners, peaceful sit-ins, or online campaigns provided they maintain civility and stick to facts.
The Bigger Picture
The real estate industry has often seen conflicts between builders and homebuyers. This ruling brings clarity and balance to that relationship. Builders now need to be more transparent and responsive, knowing that silencing customers through legal threats may not work anymore.
Conclusion
The Supreme Court’s ruling is a wake-up call to the real estate industry consumers have rights and cannot be bullied into silence. Homebuyers now have a judicially recognized shield to raise their voices respectfully and lawfully. Peaceful protest is not just a democratic right, it’s a tool to seek accountability and change.